REGULAR MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY SENATE
TO: Senators
and Executives
FROM: Belinda
Orzada, Vice President
University
Faculty Senate
SUBJECT: Regular
Faculty Senate Meeting
In
accordance with Section IV, paragraph 6 of the Constitution, the regular
meeting of the University Faculty Senate will be held on Monday, September 12th
at
I certify that hard copies of the
approval page for each undergraduate and graduate studies academic item on the
agenda are filed in the Faculty Senate Office with the appropriate signatures
of approval up through the Chair of the Faculty Senate Coordinating Committee
on Education. The Agenda will be as
follows:
I. Adoption
of the Agenda
II.
Approval of
the Minutes: May 9,
2011
III.
Memorial
Tributes: Slide Presentation
IV.
Remarks: Provost Tom Apple
V.
Announcements:
Senate President Jeff Jordan
VI.
Consent
Agenda:
VII.
Regular
Agenda:
a.
Resolutions:
1. Recommendation from the Faculty Senate Committee on Rules (Jack Baroudi, Chair) with the concurrence of the Executive Committee (Jeff Jordan, Chair) to amend the charge of the University Council on Teacher Education
WHEREAS, the University Council on Teacher Education
reviews all UD programs preparing educational professionals for work in
schools, and
WHEREAS, the description and committee charge of the
University Council on Teacher Education found in the Faculty Handbook is badly
out of date, and
WHEREAS, NCATE accreditors
will be on campus October 2011 for a site visit reviewing UD programs for
teacher education, and
WHEREAS, revisions to the Faculty handbook require
Faculty Senate approval, be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the
Faculty Senate approves the revision and updating of the description and
committee charge of the university Council on Teacher Education.
2. Recommendation from the Faculty Senate Scheduling Ad Hoc Committee (Joerg Busch, Chair) with the concurrence of the Executive Committee (Jeff Jordan, Chair) for the request to schedule final exams on the Thursday prior to graduation (attachment 1)
WHEREAS, the Thursday before graduation has been designated 'Senior Day'
only since spring 2010, and
WHEREAS, there is a need to preserve the days of
instruction during the semester and to avoid the use of Saturday as an exam
day, be it therefore
RESOLVED, that in spring semester 2012, and thereafter,
the Thursday before graduation be used as a final examination day.
3. Recommendation from the Faculty Senate Committee on Rules (Jack Baroudi, Chair) with the concurrence of the Executive Committee (Jeff Jordan, Chair) to amend the Faculty Handbook Section 1: Organization of the Faculty Standing Committee System of the Faculty and Its Senate – Academic Priorities Review Committee (attachment 1)
WHEREAS, the Academic
Priorities Review committee considers matters relevant to the work of the
Faculty Senate Coordinating Committee on Education, and
WHEREAS, the Academic Priorities Review committee
meets after the Faculty Senate elections for the coming year, and
WHEREAS, changes to the committee structure of the
Faculty Senate requires Faculty Senate approval, be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the incoming chairperson of the
Coordinating Committee on Education be a member of the Academic Priorities
Review committee.
4. Recommendation from the Faculty Senate Committee on Rules (Jack Baroudi, Chair) with the concurrence of the Executive Committee (Jeff Jordan, Chair) to amend the Faculty Handbook Section IV – 6 (attachment 1)
WHEREAS, there has not been a regular meeting of the Faculty Senate
during the month of January since at least 2000, and
WHEREAS, additions and revisions to the FACULTY HANDBOOK require Faculty
Senate approval, be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the FACULTY HANDBOOK be revised to no longer require during January
a regular meeting of the Faculty Senate.
5. Recommendation from the Faculty Senate Committee on Rules (Jack Baroudi, Chair) with the concurrence of the Executive Committee (Jeff Jordan, Chair) to amend the Faculty Handbook Section IV – Personnel Policies for Faculty – Academic Freedom and Standards of Conduct – Guidelines for writing letters of recommendation (attachment 1)
WHEREAS, the Faculty Handbook currently states: “Letters should address only the relevance of the person’s qualifications for the position about which commentary is sought; reference to an individual’s personal appearance, professional ambition, traits of character, marital status, number of children, etc. should be assiduously avoided” and
WHEREAS, many graduate schools and law schools ask about an applicant's professional ambition and traits of character, and
WHEREAS, the Faculty Handbook mandates that reviewers refrain from commenting on professional ambition and traits of character, UD applicants are disadvantaged; be it therefore
RESOLVED, that the relevant section in the Faculty Handbook as indicated in Attachment 1 concerning faculty recommendations be revised as follows: “Letters should address only the relevance of the person’s qualifications for the position about which commentary is sought; reference to an individual’s personal appearance, marital status, number of children, etc. should be assiduously avoided”
VIII.
Unfinished
Business: None
IX.
New
Business: None
X.
Introduction
of New Business:
Such items as may come before the
Senate. (No motion introduced under new
business, except a motion to refer to committee, shall be acted upon until the
next meeting of the Senate.)