REGULAR MEETING OF THE UNIVERSITY FACULTY SENATE
APRIL 1, 1996
MINUTES
Senators excused were: Kenneth Biederman, Stuart Cooper, Steven
Helmling, Paul Hooper, Alvina Quintan,
Carolyn Thoroughgood
Senators absent were: Steven Bennett, Christine Heyrman, Arnold
Kerr, John Kraft, Kara Newport Paige,
Tuncay Saydam
I. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
The agenda was approved as submitted.
II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
The minutes of the March 4, 1996 meeting were approved as
written.
III. REMARKS BY UNIVERSITY PROVOST SCHIAVELLI
The Provost had no remarks.
IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS
President Hall announced that an attachment that was
inadvertently left off the agenda had been sent out separately
and that extra copies were available. He also explained that
the speed with which the new changes had been made to the
Faculty Handbook had resulted in the appearance of the new
sexual harassment policy before it had appeared as an item of
information on the Senate agenda.
Senator Gottfredson posed several questions regarding the new
policy and suggested that the Faculty Senate may wish to
consider future revisions of the policy. She remarked that it
was her understanding that the new procedures require that the
Office of Employee Relations do two things: (1) To notify the
AAUP upon receiving a complaint, and (2) to hold a meeting
with the accused and the accuseds supervisors. She asked if
there were any other procedures that were routinely followed
which were not spelled out, for example, an unannounced
procedure that the administrative officer in charge should
interview witnesses and or the complainant?
Professor David Colton, President of the AAUP Chapter,
remarked that the changes in the Faculty Handbook were made to
inform the faculty of what the existing procedures were and
that the changes reflected present practice.
Senator Gottfredson remarked that the list of procedures
undertaken when a complaint was made may not, in fact, be
complete. Vice President Colm assured her and the Senate that
these procedures spelled out just what her office has done in
such cases.
After further discussion, Presiden Hall summarized the points.
ANNOUNCEMENT FOR CHALLENGE
The following Announcement for Challenge was accepted without
discussion:
Clarification of GPA requirements for admission to EDDV 400
Student Teaching
V. OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. There was only one item of new business, a motion from
the Committee on Rules to postpone the reapportionment of
the Senate, which would normally take place this year,
until next year after the reorganization of the colleges
had taken place.
Senator David Bellamy asked if the motion required a two-
thirds majority to approve and the chair ruled that it
did.
There being no discussion, the following motion was
unanimously approved:
MOTION TO POSTPONE REAPPORTIONMENT OF SENATE
The University Faculty Senate hereby instructs the Committee
on Rules to postpone until February 1, 1997 the recomputation
of faculty memberships in the Senate as required by the
Constitution of the Faculty of the University of Delaware,
Section IV, paragraph 4., of the Faculty Handbook.
The Senate or a committee that it designates shall be
responsible every second year for recomputing the
formula for faculty senators. . . and shall notify each
Unit by February 1 of that year of the number of faculty
senators it is to elect in each of the following two
years.
and as detailed in the Bylaws and Regulations of the
University Faculty Senate on page I-7, paragraph J.1., which
reads:
By February 1 of each year, the Secretary of the Senate
shall inform the Units of the Senate of (1) the names
of senators whose terms will expire during the current
academic year, and (2) any changes in apportionment
every other year, as stated in the Constitution. . . .
B. There being no further new business, the meeting was
adjourned at 4:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas Angell
Secretary
University Faculty Senate
TA/rg