Minutes
Undergraduate Studies
Committee of the Faculty Senate, February 10, 2003.
The meeting was called to order at 1:05 p.m. in 130
Hullihen. Present were Kenneth Koford,
Michael Arenson, Hilton Brown, Doug Buttrey, Vick Klemas, Thomas Leitch, P.K.
Krishnan, Dan Taylor, Julie Waterhouse, and Sarah Acuff. Karren Helsel-Sprey of the Faculty Senate
also attended.
The minutes of the January 24 meeting were approved, with
several typos and Dan Taylor’s active presence noted.
Old Business
1. Political Science
minor. Jim Magee, Acting Chairperson of
Political Science, had sent a letter to the committee members, which described
his rationale for the change in the Political Science minor, specifically
deleting the POSC 300, or Data Analysis course from the requirements of the
minor. The reasons were similar to
those given earlier, basically lack of faculty to teach the course, and a
feeling that some minors may not find the material so important.
A detailed
discussion ensured. Had the matter of
statistical/methodology courses been discussed with Sociology and FREC? Some faculty suggested that maybe the minor
could be abolished, but this was controversial. It was suggested that the lack of faculty could be raised with
the Dean, and if the response was that no faculty resources were available to
teach this important course for the long run, this would be taken into
consideration.
Several
members expressed their interest in finding a cooperation solution, and felt
that a department should have the right to find a solution to these
problems. By a vote of 2 in favor of
Approval and 5 in favor of further support for the changes, the Committee voted
against approval.
2. The Chemistry Department
informed the Committee that it had voted to reduce the total requirements for
the three CHEM/BIOC BS degrees to 124 credits for graduation. This had been the only concern for these
majors, which we had raised with the Department. We therefore approved the Chemistry proposals, with this
amendment, 8-0. Note that this changes
the requirements with specific wording, for three majors!
3. The Registered
Nurse proposals were considered.
Effectively, there are two parts.
One involves the B.S. for the Registered Nurse Major (BRN). This was reviewed and approved by a vote of
7 in favor, 0 opposed, and 1 abstained.
The other part involved the BRN transition to the Master’s in
Nursing. This program is for returning
nurses who will obtain first the B.S. and then go on to obtain the
Master’s. However, this program
requires that students take some graduate courses in nursing and some outside
(in psychology). These courses are
listed at the 800 level, which are supposed to be open only to graduate
students. The committee voted
unanimously to request that Nursing arrange for course numbers consistent with
the requirements placed on undergraduates, or in some other way solve this
difficulty. The vote was 8-0 in favor
of this request. It was also noted that
the overall BRM-Master’s proposal seemed excellent, with this one difficulty.
4. Health Studies, the new proposed major that had come
before the committee a year before, was discussed in its new version. The new proposal seemed much better, but the
lack of serious physiology was identified as a weakness, that could be remedied
by including a course such as BIO 276 Human Physiology. It might make sense to adjust the other
anatomy/physiology requirements in accordance with this.
The
committee voted in favor of the health studies major including this additional
course, which would make this a new major, but with temporary approval, by a
vote of 8-0-0.
New Business
1. The Elementary Teacher Education revisions were
reviewed. The changes were three--
deletion of a class in basic computing, reduction by one course of the number
of elective classes in different fields, and reduction of the total credits to
121. These were approved 8-0-1.
2. Koford asked that review of the minor in Medical
Humanities be delayed as a meeting dealing with the review of the program was
scheduled later in February. He noted
some oddities in the proposal, including the elimination of a core course due
to lack of funding (caught between two programs?) and the lack of a home for
the program --”This minor actually has no real home currently”.
3. FLL change to the wording of the College Requirement for
Foreign Language. We read over this
requirement, but after some discussion it was not quite clear what problem it
was aimed at or how it would solve it.
It clearly imposes some grade requirement as students proceed from one
course to the next, but the rationale escaped us. [Koford has indicated our
confusion and requested guidance from the chair of FLL].
4. Interactive Media, interdisciplinary minor. Koford noted that the minor had a governing
board named but not specified further, which was permitted to approve
additional courses for the minor. This
seemed inconsistent with standard Faculty Senate standards, and so he had asked
for clarification and presumably different language from the minor governing
group. He promised to report back once
something useful had been received.
5. BFA in Visual
Communications, Interactive Media Concentration, was reviewed. This adds a Concentration to the BFA in
Visual Communications. The committee
thought that the overall idea was fine, but noted that Art History had 6
credits, contrary to other programs in Art where the ART 315 course had been
deleted the Art History requirement increased.
The committee wondered if there was a small omission here that should be
caught, and asked clarification from Art.
Tied along
with the above is the equivalent BFA in Art, Fine Art, adding Interactive Media
Concentration as a Concentration. This
was passed (according to my notes). I
could not find a copy of this and had to go by the catalog!! Please advise me!!!!
We adjourned at 3:05, not due to laziness, but because
President Roselle needed the room...