The proposed changes to the Faculty Handbook,
focus on work in rank for promotion and tenure. The following changes
(additions in red italics)
are recommended to be included in the following (existing) section of the Faculty
Handbook.
Promotion & Tenure
Promotion Dossiers
On recommendation of the Faculty
Senate and approval by the administration, "faculty members at all ranks
should be subject to periodic reviews at reasonable intervals of time."
The recommended intervals are at least every two years for instructors and
assistant professors, every three to five years for tenured associate
professors, and every five to seven years for full professors. These reviews
are to be conducted by duly established committees of faculty.
………
……. Appropriate administrative officers may
make independent evaluations within the review process……
……..Upon
completion of the review, the faculty member should be apprised of the results. Faculty members will shall
be required to include their two and four year contract renewal reviews
as part of their dossier for promotion and tenure; this should include the
evaluations or reviews conducted by the established committees of the faculty
and by the corresponding administrative office (e.g., department chair).
It is the individual's
responsibility to present the best case for promotion since he or she is most
clearly involved in the outcome. It is extremely important that the dossier be
well organized and carefully prepared because superfluous or confusing
information may obscure more than it enhances one's qualifications and
achievements. Unless
otherwise noted in the faculty appointment letter, all work in rank, even if
conducted at other institutions of higher education, will
shall be considered for promotion and tenure. It will
shall be the faculty’s responsibility to include evidence of this work
in his/her dossier and to clearly identify when and where this work was
performed.
All
dossiers should be organized under the following headings in this order:
I.
Introductory
Material
A.
Contents
and Guidelines
1.
Recommendation for
Promotion Form
2.
A
table of contents
3.
A
copy of the University, college, and department promotion and tenure criteria
B.
Application
for Promotion
1.
Candidate's
letter requesting promotion
2.
A
curriculum vitae
3.
Candidate's
statement (optional)
C.
Two and Four Year Reviews for Faculty Seeking Promotion to Associate
Professor
1.
Reviews conducted by the corresponding department committee
2.
Reviews or evaluations conducted by the department chair
D.
Internal
Recommendations
1.
The
department committee's recommendation
2.
The
chairperson's recommendation
3.
College
committee's recommendation (if any)
4.
Dean
or director's recommendation or endorsement
5.
University
committee's recommendation
6.
Any
appeal materials (appeals and rebuttals)
E.
External
Recommendations
1.
Letters
of evaluation from peer reviewers together with supporting material. These
letters will be numbered sequentially for reference.
2.
Candidate's
statement (optional)